Showing posts with label water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label water. Show all posts

Saturday, September 17, 2016

My article on Solapur



I wrote an article for the Six Degrees  News website. Six Degrees is an international development news website that focusses on grassroots reports. My article was about a government programme called Jal Yukt Shivar in Maharashtra. Here it is:  

I’m excited about having done this. I’ve not been officially ‘published’ for a while now, if at all, though I guess there were opportunities at Arghyam that I’ve passed up due to other work. Six Degrees is founded by a friend, Binayak Das, so it didn’t require pitching from my side, and I didn’t get paid for it. 
Whatever I do (if I do anything at all!) in the next phase of my life, I hope writing will be a part of it. This blog has been a source of great fulfilment but time to grow beyond it. And it would be good to be able to generate some income from writing. 

I learnt some practicalities about journalism on the trip. One was the difficulty of really evaluating the success of a programme or initiative from a visit. Though I have a background in the water sector, I’m a generalist and not technically trained, so it was hard to really gauge. And for a large scale programme like this, unless you visit lots of locations, you can’t conclude anything with any degree of confidence. Your ideas about this will be appreciated. 

Anyway, on the visit to Solapur in Maharashtra, based on which I wrote the article, I had the opportunity to meet the current District Collector. It happened quite easily, after a couple of phone calls, which was quite surprising. At Arghyam, it was really painful getting meetings with IAS officers. He was a very cordial and a nice person. However the really interesting bit was about the previous Collector, Tukaram Munde. He really seems to be a larger-than-life person who managed to achieve spectacular results. I have some sense of administration from work at Arghyam, and this chap in my opinion is off the charts. The District Collector (or Commissioner as he is called in some districts) has a really difficult job. There’s just too much stuff, too many subjects to work on. There are around 30 government departments/programmes that he is the head for. The DC of Sholapur told me there are literally hundreds of committees that he  chairs. Then there is the lack of good quality and quantity of HR to work with, including corrupt people. And unlike the private sector, you can't fire people easily. There are many restrictions and rules to getting work done, much less flexibility than in the private sector. There is the political system to be managed, which could be quite formidable. And in the first place, many of the programmes are ill-designed and ‘dead-on-arrival’. So I’d say, as far as serious impact is concerned, the DC is also for the most part, ‘dead-on-arrival’. However, Mr. Mundhe somehow managed to crack the system and actually get it to deliver. For the life of me, I cannot visualise how he did it. He is now head of Navi Mumbai district and making waves there too. A man to watch (and you can watch some of his exploits by searching on the web). 

Back to the trip again. There is a ‘power’ element in the field trip portion of visits like these , the government staff down the line from the DC are very deferential. At the same time I also got the sense that they thought I did not understand the stuff, and were patronising. I also find it tiring to meet a large number of people in a short span - my comfort level certainly is in meeting fewer people and developing stronger connections with them. 

I wonder where Jalyukt Shivar is going. There seem to be many issues with the scheme, much more so in other districts. But it also seems to have huge potential from the Solapur experience. This programme seems to have the tantalising potential to be the ‘Holy Grail’ for water security in drought-affected districts. But many a slip between the cup and the lip. At the same time some other large scale success stories are emerging from other districts like Dewas in Madhya Pradesh. Is there a trend here ? In the past, it was always about NGO models and touting them, but there were very few examples of successes at scale. Are we entering a tipping point where we get more and and more successes at scale. I fervently hope so. 


An interesting side point is that Solapur district has 2 products with the GI (Geographical Indication) tag, Maldandi jowar and Sangoli pomogranate. Here is a full list of GI tagged products in India: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Geographical_Indications_in_India 
It seems this idea is taking off in India.


Some more photos from the trip below:


Check dams storing water




Compartment bunds under construction


Dry open wells that are now recharged with water



A farm pond

Local farmer




Thursday, October 08, 2015

"Prof, no one is reading you"





Prof. Biswas with Prof. Eduardo Araral, who chaired the talk


We had a talk on 23rd September by Prof. Asit Biswas. Prof. Biswas is very well-respected in the water sector and a recipient of the World Water Prize. I'm taking a course on water policy and governance with him (and Dr. Tortajada). Its quite demanding and we're having to do a lot of writing  which is proving unexpectedly challenging, but I think I'm improving!

Dr. Biswas' talk was on  academia creating impact by writing in the popular media, more specifically writing op-eds. Op-ed = 'opposite-editorial'.  the space in newspapers given to experts and others to give their independent views on matters of public importance. They're called op-eds because they're often run next to the newspaper's own opinion pieces, the editorials. While the talk was aimed at academics, the points are very relevant for people from the NGO sector too.

Dr. Biswas talked of the increasing irrelevance of academic publishing for public policy and impact. Quoting from the flyer publicising the talk (http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/OP-Eds_Writing-Publishing-and-Impacts.pdf): "Latest statistics indicate that 80% of papers in Humanities do not attract even a single citation. Also, if a paper is cited, it does not mean the person citing it has read the whole paper fully. We estimate an average paper in Humanities is read by no more than 10 people".

Dr. Biswas did an op-ed in the Straits Times, (http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/prof-no-one-is-reading-you) the main newspaper in Singapore on this very topic - "Prof, no one is reading you". Apparently, it has become the most read article of the Straits Times with 65000 online shares, 7000 tweets and even translated into other languages. So it would seem the topic resonated strongly with many people.

Other points from the talk:
- Dr. Biswas talked about Project Syndicate. Quoting from the Straits Times article above: " One effective model is Project Syndicate, a non-profit organisation, which distributes commentary by the world's thought leaders to more than 500 newspapers comprising 300 million readers in 154 countries. Any commentary accepted by Project Syndicate may be translated into up to 12 other languages and then distributed globally to the entire network.". Prof Biswas has now an agreement with Project Syndicate to distribute four of his op-eds each year.

- Ministers and policy makers pay attention to what gets published. A typical method of doing this is for the Ministers' staff to create a roundup of all relevant news across key media outlets every day. Prof Biswas cited examples from his personal knowledge from Canada, India and Qatar of Ministers who do this

- Examples of recent impact from op-eds:
    An article he wrote on Think Tanks in the "Diplomat" magazine (http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/the-rise-of-asias-think-tanks/)  was shared by the wife of the Prime Minister of Singapore on her FB page, and presumably reached the PM too
    An op-ed in the Straits Times on the haze (http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/to-tackle-haze-win-over-the-indonesian-public) got a response from the Singapore Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, Vivian Balakrishnan, who wrote back that he liked it and that his minstry is seriously looking at the suggestions.

- Media needs a peg. There was once a request from a Chinese publication for an article on drought, followed by a urgent communication that rains had started and unless they moved really quickly the article could not be run until the next drought!

- Media needs you to take a stand. No 'on the the one hand, on the other hand' business. The job of the editor is to 'sell newspaper' so if you want to get published you have to be aligned with that. Being controversial does not hurt! Winston Churchill said: "You have enemies? Good. That means you have stood up for something in your life"

- Media's deadlines are significantly more demanding than for academic publication and you need to be prepared for that. Prof. Biswas has stayed up late nights on occasion to do what was needed to get a piece out in time to a media outlet.

- A corollary  is that media will occasionally edit what you say, even without asking. Sometimes that results in significant distortion of what you meant. Again, something you have to accept and be prepared for if you want to play the public impact game. 

- Invest your time in developing relationships with good newspaper editors and journalists. They get a lot of submissions and reject 95% of them. If you have a relationship with them, they will trust you. Occasionally have lunch/coffee with them to understand their challenges,what they need, what they're looking for.

- One way to get their attention in the first place is to be active on social media. At least 300 media personalities from many countries follow Prof. Biswas on LinkedIn. 

- Op-ed sizes are coming down and nowadays they are looking for around 650-700 words. You must be able to make your point in that space

- Nowadays Prof Biswas writes an average of one op-ed a week.

- Prof. Biswas writes a lot op-eds with graduate students, which gives them visibility and training and many of them go on to do a lot of such writing on their own. He expressed some disappointment with the general graduate student body at the LKY School. Students do not seem to be interested in taking up this valuable opportunity to get trained in writing op-eds and thus improving public policy

-----
Addenda: An article in the Guardian that nicely builds on some of the points here

http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/sep/04/academics-are-being-hoodwinked-into-writing-books-nobody-can-buy

A recent followup article by Prof Biswas
http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/prof-no-one-is-using-your-ideas